Religion, liberalism, the monsoon, and the tribe without numbers
I woke up today morning to the news of Sarkozy banning the burqa in France. I think that's a really stupid move. While I am an atheist and think it's really kind of stupid to have a woman all covered from head to toe, I do believe that if it is not being imposed on her, she has every right to wear it if she wants to. It's a personal choice. To me it's equivalent to banning homosexuality on account of it not being "natural". I mean who the hell is anybody to decide what anybody else can or cannot do? I have been thinking about this because of a post by a certain blogger called M (refuse to link) in Mumbai who once put up a post on her decision to remain a virgin till her marriage on account of her devout faith in Christianity, and her defense of the same. Similar to choosing to wear a burqa, this is a personal choice, and she is free to have it as well as to air it.
What disturbed me however, was her response to the healthy debate this article induced. Some people (agnostic/atheist) commented on the post saying that it was irresponsible of her to do so and that what is needed in this day and age is education regarding safe sex, not preaching as to its abstinence. Which is a valid point as well. In response, M went up in righteous defense (a standard tendency with her) saying she did not want people judging her on the basis of her religious beliefs and her choices! I mean hello, did I miss something?
See I am not against any religion, inasmuch as it remains a private matter, a personal choice and does not hamper the lives of others or the peace of society. But religion that goes up in self-defense at the slightest debate really gets me riled up. As an atheist, I am often judged by religious people, yet, because they are in a majority, they somehow think that their way is right and something's wrong with me. If believing is a personal choice, then so is not-believing, and it should be equally respected.
I watched Religulous the other day, and this (amongst other things like Angels and Demons, a documentary on the re-surge of Creationism in Europe, as well as certain essays on the religiousness of American society) brought home the fact that most religion around us today is, unfortunately, not staying out of things which are, frankly (and I mean every offense when I say this) none of it's business. Like science, for that matter. I mean, you can believe, if you so wish, that the world was created by the Almighty in seven days; but you sure as hell can't create a museum filled with such absolute bullshit as displays of early humans co-existing with dinosaurs, and Noah's ark and call it "evidence". i mean, the only response that can get from me is FUCK YOU. As somebody who believes in the power of science (to me it is magical) this really really bothers me. Evolution has been proven time and time again, and if you don't want to believe it that's fine, but please do not furnish absolute nonsense as evidence to refute it. That is just wrong. And a money-making endeavour at that. It is things like this about religion that get me all hot and bothered - which is why the very mention of things like Scientology or Homeopathy gets my blood boiling. My advice to you is, if you believe very strongly in any of these things, stay away from me before things get really ugly.
I must hasten to add here that I do have an open mind to everything. But when it comes to choosing what to believe in, I like to have my evidence. More importantly, I can totally understand being a believer in a completely non-literal sense. To me faith is faith, it doesn't require evidence. And I have respect for this faith. If you tell me you believe in a God because you just do, I can completely understand that. But then don't try to prove to me that God exists, because there is no such proof. My point in the whole discussion here is that faith and empirical science must be kept apart, and the two should not interfere with each other, because they honestly do not have anything in common.
__
In other news, the monsoon is finally here. I am one of those rarities for a Mumbaikar: somebody who absolutely hates the monsoon. So you can imagine how happily I was taken aback when I actually began waiting and praying for the monsoons like all other Mumbaikars this year. (Two reasons: one being the immense unbearable heat, secondly another impending arrival which is making me very happy)
And after all those days of cursing and waiting and hoping and praying the monsoon finally came today. For the first time in my life, I woke up to the first rains and did not complain about how dark it was (anybody who knows me knows how much I detest the lack of sunlight, especially early in the morning), or about the squidgy-mugginess of it all. I actually rejoiced in the cooler weather, the wind, the green-ness of the trees and the joy of coming home, washing your feet in warm water, taking a blanket and drinking a hot cup of tea.
But even before the day was over, I felt the old creeping feeling come on me. I am now back to dreading the splashing around in the muck, the wet stickiness of the clothes that always somehow leaves u itching, the filthiness of railway stations, the depression that envelops u on waking up to a rainy day, the constant battle with temperamental umbrellas, the many infections that do the rounds and the not being able to wear whatever u want (especially this last one!).
Sigh, I guess some things just don't change. My enthusiasm about the monsoon's arrival has lasted only one day.
__
Slow day at work today. But read a very very interesting article today, thanks to vaidehi:
www.independent.co.uk/news/science/unloc
Nothing to say about it, except, I knew it ;-) Ha ha!
